Network Allowlist
Blocked by your corporate proxy? Here is the exact allowlist.
If your secure web gateway will not load this site or will not let Bolt install, this page has everything your network team needs: the specific hostnames, why each one is contacted, and the per-vendor steps to allow them. Written to be forwarded to a security admin without edits.
The short version
Five hostnames on 443. That is the whole ask.
If you only read one section, allow these outbound over HTTPS and Bolt will install and stay current:
sparcle.app
api.github.com
github.com
release-assets.githubusercontent.com
objects.githubusercontent.com
Everything else on this page is detail: what each host is for, what Bolt contacts once it is running, and how to enter these into your specific gateway.
Nothing here is a check-in. There is no activation call, no licence phone-home, and no telemetry endpoint: the licence is a signed token the deployment verifies offline against a key compiled into the binary. The one thing Bolt starts on its own is an update check, and it asks two hosts for the same manifest, GitHub first and sparcle.app second. That second one is ours, so we list it rather than let you find it in a proxy log.
Install time
What the installer contacts.
Required to download and install Bolt. Verified against the shipping installer and a live release-asset redirect.
sparcle.appapi.github.comgithub.comrelease-assets.githubusercontent.comobjects.githubusercontent.com
The common failure is allowing github.com but not
release-assets.githubusercontent.com. GitHub issues a redirect to that host for
the actual bytes, so the download begins and then fails partway. If your gateway logs show a
302 followed by a block, that is this.
Runtime, required
What Bolt contacts once installed.
Three hosts, all for updates and nothing else. Block them and Bolt keeps working.
github.comsparcle.apprelease-assets.githubusercontent.comRuntime, optional
Contacted only if you turn the feature on.
None of these are reached by default. Each corresponds to a capability a user or admin explicitly enables, and most of them are your own systems rather than ours.
huggingface.co, and the CDN hosts it redirects to (us.aws.cdn.hf.co, cdn-lfs.huggingface.co)Your LLM endpointaccounts.google.com, www.googleapis.com, gmail.googleapis.com, calendar.google.comlogin.microsoftonline.com, graph.microsoft.com, outlook.office.comYour MCP server hostnamesBolt's launcher recognition, local search, and utility calls are deterministic and run on-device with no network egress in any configuration. See where the model runs for the full egress picture, including the PII masking that runs before any outbound model call.
Per-vendor steps
How to enter this into your gateway.
The mechanism differs by vendor but the shape does not: a customer-defined allow entry, evaluated ahead of category-based block rules.
Zscaler (ZIA)
Cisco Umbrella and Secure Access
Netskope
Fortinet FortiGate
Broadcom, Symantec, Forcepoint, iboss, Menlo and others
Third-party categorization
How the reputation databases currently rate us.
Checked directly at each vendor's public lookup tool on the date shown. We publish the unflattering rows too, because your gateway is going to tell you anyway.
No vendor we have checked classifies this domain as malicious, phishing, or a command-and-control destination, and Talos confirms it is not on its block list. Where a row says uncategorized, that is an absence of data rather than an adverse finding.
If your gateway says uncategorized
You can also ask your vendor to categorize us.
An allow list fixes your organization. Categorization fixes it for everyone, and a submission from a paying customer carries considerably more weight with a vendor than one from the site owner. If you are willing, the submission portals are:
- Cisco Talos, Reputation Center, via Submit Content Categorization Ticket
- Trellix and McAfee, Customer URL Ticketing, which allows up to three suggested categories
- Zscaler, Site Review
- Broadcom and Symantec, WebPulse Site Review
- Fortinet, rating submission
- Palo Alto Networks, Test A Site, already correct as of the table above, so nothing to file
The accurate categories for this domain are Business, Computers and Internet, Software Updates, or Freeware and Shareware. Palo Alto independently arrived at Computer-and-Internet-Info, which is the same answer. sparcle.app is a vendor marketing and download site: it hosts no model, accepts no prompts, and returns no generated output, so the generative-AI categories do not apply to it under the definitions those vendors publish.
Honest framing
Why you are probably seeing this block.
We are a new domain, so some databases have not categorized us yet
Our installers are code-signed and notarized
We would rather you allow-list us narrowly than broadly
Verify before you trust
Check the download yourself.
Every release publishes SHA-256 checksums. To verify a download before running it:
# macOS and Linux
shasum -a 256 <the downloaded file>
# Windows PowerShell
Get-FileHash -Algorithm SHA256 <the downloaded file>
Compare the result against the checksum published with the release. If your policy is to
review installer scripts before execution, both are plain text and readable in a browser at
/install.sh and
/install.ps1. If your policy prohibits piped shell
installers outright, download the platform installer directly from the
download page and skip the script entirely.
Still blocked, or need this in a different format?
We will write the exact steps for your gateway, or answer a security questionnaire, usually within one business day.