Company

Why Sparcle exists, in one statement

What we give a security, compliance or IT buyer, matched to what that buyer needs.

Value proposition canvas. Value map: products and services are Bolt, Aeira, the admin console and the audit chain. Gain creators are fewer AI calls and lower token spend, bring your own model on any app, a signed audit chain verifiable offline, a pre-answered security questionnaire, and free to start. Pain relievers check what you paste and mask on request, admin policy through SSO and MDM, answers first with no model call, every query filtered to who asks, and self-hosted so your data is never in our cloud. Customer profile of the compliance or IT buyer: gains are passing the security review, lower AI spend, any AI with no lock-in, and proof an auditor accepts; pains are people pasting secrets into AI, no policy for AI use, blocks people work around, and agents that see too much data; jobs are letting teams use AI, passing audits, finding the right information and keeping work moving.
The value map and the customer profile, side by side.

Fit check

Each pain, and what answers it

The painWhat answers it
People paste secrets into AIBolt checks what you paste into AI sites on your device, and masks it when you choose or policy says so.
No policy for AI useAdmins set policy through SSO, MDM and policy as code, with a signed audit chain you can verify offline.
Blocks people work aroundBolt answers common questions on the device with no model call, so the safe path is also the fast one.
Agents see too much dataAeira filters every query to the caller, so people and AI agents see only what they are entitled to see.

The buyer

What they want, and what gets in the way

Jobs

What they are trying to do

Let teams use AI, pass audits, find the right information, and keep work moving.

Gains

What would make it a win

Pass the security review, lower AI spend, pick any AI with no lock-in, and have proof an auditor accepts.

Pains

What goes wrong today

People paste secrets into AI, there is no policy for AI use, blocks get worked around, and agents see too much data.

Why the pains are real

Three numbers, with their sources

The same third-party figures we cite elsewhere on the site, with their editions.

1 in 4

malicious breaches is AI-enabled, at about $6M against a $4.99M average. IBM Cost of a Data Breach, 2026.

About $670K

added to the average breach by shadow AI, and most breached organizations had no AI governance policy. IBM Cost of a Data Breach, 2025.

73%

of AI-enabled browser extensions hold high or critical permission scope. LayerX Browser Extension Security Report, 2026.

Next

See how the business works, or start free

The business model page lays out who we serve and what every tier costs.